Assistant Professor of Economics
Research
Peer-Reviewed Publications
-
"Help Really Wanted? The Impact of Age Stereotypes in Job Ads on Applications from Older Workers" (with Ian Burn, Daniel Ladd, and David Neumark), Forthcoming at The Journal of Labor Economics Vol. 44 (4), October 2026. [NBER Working Paper 30287] Media Coverage: The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Barron's, MarketWatch
-
"Economic Distress and Electoral Consequences: Evidence from Appalachia" (Sole Author), The Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 106 (3), pg. 778-793, May 2024. [A. Kimball Romney Award]
[Open Access Manuscript] Media Coverage: The Boston Globe
-
"The Impact of Post-Admission Merit Scholarships on Enrollment Decisions and Degree Attainment: Evidence from Randomization" (Sole Author), The Economics of Education Review Vol. 84, 102221, February 2022.
Special Issues and Invited Submissions
-
"Machine Learning and Perceived Age Stereotypes in Job Ads: Evidence from an Experiment" (with Ian Burn, Daniel Ladd, and David Neumark), The Journal of Pension Economics and Finance Vol. 22 (4), pg. 463 - 489, October 2023.
-
"Age Discrimination and Age Stereotypes in Job Ads" (with Ian Burn, Daniel Ladd, and David Neumark), Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letters, March 2023.
Working Papers
"Do Tuition Subsidies Raise Political Participation?"
Revisions Requested at The American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
(with Igor Geyn) [Working Paper]
Abstract: Civic externalities motivate public education spending, but estimates of the civic returns to large-scale education subsidies are scarce. We use 16 million financial aid applications and a regression discontinuity (RD) design to estimate how the United States’ largest tuition-free college program impacted political participation. We find that each of the 2.6 million awards increased a student’s voter turnout rate by 4 to 12 percentage points in 2020, raising total voter turnout by 1 percentage point and Biden’s margin of victory by 0.5 percentage points in the awarding state. We calculate that 1 out of every 66 voters cast a ballot because of the tuition subsidy under conservative assumptions and find evidence consistent with peer socialization, among other mechanisms. The results are externally validated with another RD design using 2.5 million students local to a notch in the generosity of the industrial world’s largest tuition subsidy, the Pell Grant. Our findings demonstrate that the civic externalities of education spending can exceed its labor market returns and are large enough to sway elections.
"The Effect of Selective Colleges on Student Partisanship"
(Sole Author) [SOCAE 2022 Best Paper Award] [Working Paper]
Media Coverage: The Boston Globe, Marginal Revolution
Abstract: College-educated voters are trending toward the political left across democracies, with the most politically powerful and left-leaning students originating from a smaller number of elite colleges. Using data on over 250,000 University of California applicants and multiple discontinuous admission policies, I estimate the impact of elite colleges on later life partisanship. Admission to highly selective campuses shifts students away from the Republican Party and toward independent or Democratic registration. Administrative data, surveys, and a poll of in-sample students show that on-campus peer socialization and long-run mechanisms like graduate school attendance are plausible, but intentional efforts by faculty to persuade their students are unlikely to explain these results.
"Education Exports and Human Capital Flows: Evidence from a Tuition Waiver Lottery"
(Sole Author) [Draft Available Upon Request]
Abstract: Education exports to nonresident students play an important role among policies to strategically relocate skilled workers. Although nonresident supplemental tuition can cross-subsidize the college attendance of local students, it may deter high-skill nonresidents from enrolling and migrating to the host location. This study provides estimates of the longer-run costs of nonresident tuition using a pre-analysis plan and a fee waiver lottery at a major American university. I find that larger tuition waivers increase in-state residency with American citizenship 12 years later, attracting workers with research and executive skills. Every 1,000 dollars in tuition waiver offers cost the university roughly 100 dollars in the short-run, but raises longer-run earnings in the state by over 2,500 dollars, underscoring large asymmetries between short-run college revenue and the social returns to nonresident tuition.
Works in Progress
"Partisan Costs of Unfulfilled Student Loan Forgiveness" (with Michael Patrick Span)
"From Training to Employment: A Multi-Inquiry Study of Noncredit Workforce Training Programs" (with Di Xu, Benjamin Castleman, Catherine Finnegan, Betsy Tessler, Kelli Bird, and Sabrina Solanki)
"Rational Inattention and the Size of Government" (Sole Author)